membrane: be advantage for cell

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents polymer
Weight: 0.64
, layer
Weight: 0.62
, product
Weight: 0.59
, material
Weight: 0.59
Siblings amniotic fluid
Weight: 0.63
, ethylene oxide
Weight: 0.36
, polyethylene
Weight: 0.36
, dna molecule
Weight: 0.35
, resin
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be advantage for cell 1.00
be advantage to cell 1.00
has quality advantage 0.83
be important for cells 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(membrane, be advantage for cell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(membrane, be advantage for cell)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(membrane, be advantage for cell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(membrane, be advantage to cell)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(membrane, be advantage for cell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(membrane, be advantage to cell)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(membrane, be advantage for cell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(membrane, be advantage to cell)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(membrane, be advantage for cell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(membrane, be advantage to cell)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(membrane, be advantage for cell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(membrane, has quality advantage)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(membrane, be advantage for cell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(membrane, has quality advantage)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(membrane, be advantage for cell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(membrane, has quality advantage)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(membrane, be advantage for cell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(membrane, has quality advantage)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(membrane, be advantage for cell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(membrane, be advantage for cell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(membrane, be advantage for cell)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(membrane, be advantage for cell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(membrane, be advantage for cell)