membrane: has quality advantage

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents polymer
Weight: 0.64
, layer
Weight: 0.62
, product
Weight: 0.59
, material
Weight: 0.59
Siblings amniotic fluid
Weight: 0.63
, ethylene oxide
Weight: 0.36
, polyethylene
Weight: 0.36
, dna molecule
Weight: 0.35
, resin
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality advantage 1.00
be advantage for cell 0.83
be advantage to cell 0.83
has quality good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(membrane, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(membrane, has quality advantage)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(membrane, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(membrane, be advantage for cell)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(membrane, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(membrane, be advantage to cell)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(membrane, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(membrane, be advantage to cell)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(membrane, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(membrane, be advantage for cell)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(membrane, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(membrane, be advantage to cell)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(membrane, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(membrane, be advantage for cell)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(membrane, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(membrane, be advantage for cell)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(membrane, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(membrane, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(membrane, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(membrane, be advantage to cell)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(membrane, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(membrane, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(membrane, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(membrane, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(membrane, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(membrane, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(membrane, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(membrane, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(membrane, has quality advantage)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(membrane, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(membrane, has quality advantage)