membrane: is potential important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents polymer
Weight: 0.64
, layer
Weight: 0.62
, product
Weight: 0.59
, material
Weight: 0.59
Siblings amniotic fluid
Weight: 0.63
, ethylene oxide
Weight: 0.36
, polyethylene
Weight: 0.36
, dna molecule
Weight: 0.35
, resin
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is potential important 1.00
has state potential 0.90
is potential negative 70 0.88
is potential negative 0.88
is potential maintained 0.80
be important for growth 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(membrane, is potential important)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(amniotic fluid, be important for growth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(membrane, is potential important)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(amniotic fluid, be important for growth)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(amniotic fluid, be important for growth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(membrane, is potential important)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(membrane, is potential important)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(membrane, is potential important)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(membrane, has state potential)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(membrane, is potential important)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(membrane, is potential negative)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(membrane, is potential important)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(membrane, is potential negative 70)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(membrane, is potential important)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(membrane, has state potential)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(membrane, is potential important)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(membrane, has state potential)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(membrane, is potential important)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(membrane, is potential negative)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(membrane, is potential important)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(membrane, is potential negative 70)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(membrane, is potential important)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(membrane, is potential negative)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(membrane, is potential important)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(membrane, is potential negative 70)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(membrane, is potential important)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(membrane, is potential maintained)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(membrane, is potential important)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(membrane, is potential negative 70)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(membrane, is potential important)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(membrane, is potential maintained)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(membrane, is potential important)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(membrane, has state potential)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(membrane, is potential important)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(membrane, is potential negative)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(membrane, is potential important)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(membrane, is potential maintained)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(membrane, is potential important)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(membrane, is potential maintained)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(membrane, is potential important)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(membrane, is potential important)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(membrane, is potential important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(membrane, is potential important)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(membrane, is potential important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(membrane, is potential important)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(amniotic fluid, be important for growth)