men: be attractive to woman

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents film
Weight: 0.53
, book
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.51
, movie
Weight: 0.49
, novel
Weight: 0.47
Siblings wise man
Weight: 0.32
, drunk people
Weight: 0.31
, gentleman
Weight: 0.30
, old lady
Weight: 0.30
, tennis player
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be attractive to woman 1.00
wants to look at beautiful woman 0.85
like woman 0.84
be at woman 0.83
be attract to woman 0.83
be more attractive when they be small 0.83
be attract to beatiful woman 0.83
need woman 0.81
be different from woman 0.79
fancy woman 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(thing, be more attractive when they be small) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(men, be attractive to woman)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(men, be attractive to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(thing, be more attractive when they be small)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(men, be attractive to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(thing, be more attractive when they be small)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(thing, be more attractive when they be small) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(men, be attractive to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(men, be attractive to woman)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(men, be attractive to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(men, be attractive to woman)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(men, be attractive to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(men, be attract to woman)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(men, be attractive to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(men, be at woman)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(men, be attractive to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(men, be at woman)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(men, be attractive to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(men, be attract to woman)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(men, be attractive to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(men, fancy woman)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(men, be attractive to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(men, be attractive to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(men, be attractive to woman)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(men, be attractive to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(men, be attractive to woman)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(men, be attractive to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(thing, be more attractive when they be small)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(men, be attractive to woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(thing, be more attractive when they be small)