menopause: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents female reproductive system
Weight: 0.62
, condition
Weight: 0.61
, topic
Weight: 0.58
, event
Weight: 0.55
, issue
Weight: 0.53
Siblings menstruation
Weight: 0.34
, hypothyroidism
Weight: 0.34
, pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.34
, lupus
Weight: 0.34
, puberty
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
is bad people 0.80
is bad thing 0.79
CAN good 0.78
has quality function 0.76
is good thing 0.75
has quality definition 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(menopause, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(puberty, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(menopause, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(lupus, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(menopause, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(hypothyroidism, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(menopause, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(hypothyroidism, has quality definition)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(menopause, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(puberty, has quality function)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(menopause, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(puberty, is good thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(menopause, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(puberty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(puberty, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(menopause, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(hypothyroidism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(hypothyroidism, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(menopause, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(lupus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(lupus, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(menopause, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(puberty, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(puberty, is good thing)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(menopause, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(puberty, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(puberty, has quality function)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(menopause, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(hypothyroidism, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(hypothyroidism, has quality definition)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(menopause, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(menopause, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(menopause, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(menopause, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(menopause, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(menopause, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(menopause, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(menopause, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(menopause, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(menopause, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(menopause, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(menopause, is bad thing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(menopause, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(menopause, is bad thing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(menopause, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(menopause, is bad thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(menopause, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(menopause, is bad thing)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(menopause, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(menopause, is good thing)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(menopause, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(menopause, is good thing)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(menopause, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(menopause, is good thing)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(menopause, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(menopause, is good thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(menopause, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(menopause, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(menopause, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(menopause, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(menopause, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(menopause, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(puberty, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(menopause, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hypothyroidism, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(menopause, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(lupus, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(menopause, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(puberty, is good thing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(menopause, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(puberty, has quality function)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(menopause, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(hypothyroidism, has quality definition)