menu: be at restaurants

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents icon
Weight: 0.60
, section
Weight: 0.59
, code
Weight: 0.57
, detail
Weight: 0.57
Siblings breakfast
Weight: 0.65
, zip code
Weight: 0.32
, sidebar
Weight: 0.31
, line item
Weight: 0.31
, layout
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at restaurants 1.00
be at restaurants sticky 0.89
be important for restaurant 0.87
is food breakfast food 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(menu, be at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(breakfast, is food breakfast food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(menu, be at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(breakfast, is food breakfast food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(breakfast, is food breakfast food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(menu, be at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(menu, be at restaurants)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(menu, be at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(menu, be at restaurants sticky)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(menu, be at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(menu, be at restaurants sticky)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(menu, be at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(menu, be at restaurants sticky)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(menu, be at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(menu, be at restaurants sticky)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(menu, be at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(menu, be important for restaurant)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(menu, be at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(menu, be important for restaurant)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(menu, be at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(menu, be important for restaurant)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(menu, be at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(menu, be important for restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(menu, be at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(menu, be at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(menu, be at restaurants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(menu, be at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(menu, be at restaurants)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(menu, be at restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(breakfast, is food breakfast food)