menu: be important for restaurant

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents icon
Weight: 0.60
, section
Weight: 0.59
, code
Weight: 0.57
, detail
Weight: 0.57
Siblings breakfast
Weight: 0.65
, zip code
Weight: 0.32
, sidebar
Weight: 0.31
, line item
Weight: 0.31
, layout
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for restaurant 1.00
be at restaurants 0.87
be at restaurants sticky 0.82
be considered as important meal 0.77
be considered important meal 0.77
is important meal 0.77
is more important meal 0.77
is most important meal 0.76
be considered as important meal of day 0.76
is food breakfast food 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(menu, be important for restaurant)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(breakfast, be considered as important meal of day)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(menu, be important for restaurant)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(breakfast, be considered important meal)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(menu, be important for restaurant)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(breakfast, be considered as important meal)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(menu, be important for restaurant)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(breakfast, is more important meal)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(menu, be important for restaurant)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(breakfast, is important meal)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(menu, be important for restaurant)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(breakfast, is food breakfast food)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(breakfast, is food breakfast food)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(menu, be important for restaurant)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(breakfast, is important meal)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(breakfast, is important meal)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(menu, be important for restaurant)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(breakfast, is more important meal)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(breakfast, is more important meal)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(menu, be important for restaurant)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(breakfast, is most important meal)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(breakfast, is most important meal)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(menu, be important for restaurant)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(breakfast, be considered as important meal)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(breakfast, be considered as important meal)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(menu, be important for restaurant)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(menu, be important for restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(menu, be important for restaurant)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(menu, be at restaurants)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(menu, be important for restaurant)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(menu, be at restaurants)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(menu, be important for restaurant)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(menu, be at restaurants)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(menu, be important for restaurant)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(menu, be at restaurants sticky)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(menu, be important for restaurant)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(menu, be at restaurants sticky)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(menu, be important for restaurant)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(menu, be important for restaurant)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(menu, be important for restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(menu, be important for restaurant)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(menu, be important for restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(menu, be important for restaurant)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(breakfast, is food breakfast food)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(menu, be important for restaurant)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(breakfast, be considered important meal)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(menu, be important for restaurant)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(breakfast, be considered as important meal)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(menu, be important for restaurant)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(breakfast, be considered as important meal of day)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(menu, be important for restaurant)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(breakfast, is important meal)
...