menu: be important design

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents icon
Weight: 0.60
, section
Weight: 0.59
, code
Weight: 0.57
, detail
Weight: 0.57
Siblings breakfast
Weight: 0.65
, zip code
Weight: 0.32
, sidebar
Weight: 0.31
, line item
Weight: 0.31
, layout
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important design 1.00
is engineering 0.77
be important in art 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(detail, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(menu, be important design)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(menu, be important design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(detail, be important in art)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(menu, be important design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(detail, be important in art)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(detail, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(menu, be important design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(menu, be important design)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(menu, be important design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(menu, be important design)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(menu, be important design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(menu, is engineering)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(menu, be important design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(menu, is engineering)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(menu, be important design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(menu, is engineering)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(menu, be important design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(menu, is engineering)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(menu, be important design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(menu, be important design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(menu, be important design)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(menu, be important design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(menu, be important design)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(menu, be important design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(detail, be important in art)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(menu, be important design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(detail, be important in art)