detail: be important in art

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.63
, explanation
Weight: 0.63
, aspect
Weight: 0.60
, tool
Weight: 0.60
Siblings social security number
Weight: 0.67
, cover
Weight: 0.64
, line item
Weight: 0.62
, visibility
Weight: 0.62
, bay window
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in art 1.00
be important to science 0.77
be important in teaching 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(explanation, be important to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(detail, be important in art)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(explanation, be important in teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(detail, be important in art)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(detail, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(explanation, be important in teaching)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(detail, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(explanation, be important to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(detail, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be important to science)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(detail, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be important in teaching)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(explanation, be important to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(detail, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(detail, be important in art)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(explanation, be important in teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(detail, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(detail, be important in art)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(detail, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(detail, be important in art)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(detail, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(detail, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(detail, be important in art)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(detail, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(detail, be important in art)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(detail, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(explanation, be important in teaching)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(detail, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(explanation, be important to science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(detail, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(explanation, be important in teaching)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(detail, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(explanation, be important to science)