mercury: was bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents substance
Weight: 0.69
, poison
Weight: 0.66
, chemical
Weight: 0.64
, ingredient
Weight: 0.63
, air pollution
Weight: 0.62
Siblings arsenic
Weight: 0.37
, sodium fluoride
Weight: 0.37
, sodium sulfate
Weight: 0.37
, sodium nitrate
Weight: 0.37
, sodium hydroxide
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was bad 1.00
be bad for us 0.83
is terrible 0.83
be bad in water 0.83
was discorverd 0.82
be bad in city 0.81
be bad for health 0.80
be bad for earth 0.80
be bad for environment 0.79
was come to discoverness 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(poison, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(mercury, was bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(poison, be bad for health)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(mercury, was bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(air pollution, be bad for health)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(mercury, was bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(air pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(mercury, was bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(air pollution, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(mercury, was bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be bad for earth)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be bad for health)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(poison, be bad for health)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(poison, is terrible)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for earth)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(poison, be bad for health)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for health)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(poison, is terrible)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(arsenic, be bad in water)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(arsenic, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(poison, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(mercury, was bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(poison, be bad for health)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(mercury, was bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(air pollution, be bad for health)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(mercury, was bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(air pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(mercury, was bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(air pollution, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(mercury, was bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(arsenic, be bad in water)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(arsenic, be bad in water)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(arsenic, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(arsenic, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(mercury, was bad)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(mercury, was discorverd)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(mercury, be bad for environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(mercury, be bad for environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(mercury, be bad for environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(mercury, was discorverd)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(mercury, was discorverd)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(mercury, be bad for environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(mercury, was discorverd)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mercury, was bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(mercury, was bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad for earth)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad for environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad for health)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(poison, is terrible)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(poison, be bad for health)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(arsenic, be bad in water)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(arsenic, be bad for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad for earth)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(poison, is terrible)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad for environment)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad for health)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(mercury, was bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(poison, be bad for health)