air pollution: be bad for health

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hazard
Weight: 0.71
, problem
Weight: 0.66
, pollution
Weight: 0.66
, concern
Weight: 0.65
Siblings carbon dioxide
Weight: 0.76
, acid rain
Weight: 0.71
, global warming
Weight: 0.65
, cigarette smoking
Weight: 0.65
, dust
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for health 1.00
be bad for human health 0.94
has quality bad 0.81
is health threat 0.81
be bad for environment 0.80
is global health concern 0.80
be bad for us 0.78
be bad for animals 0.77
be bad for humans 0.77
be bad in city 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pollution, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad for health)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(pollution, be bad for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad for health)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(pollution, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad for health)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(pollution, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad for health)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(pollution, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(pollution, be bad for animals)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(pollution, be bad for humans)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(pollution, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for animals)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(acid rain, be bad for human health)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(global warming, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(global warming, be bad for humans)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dust, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(carbon dioxide, be bad for humans)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(acid rain, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(acid rain, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(carbon dioxide, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cigarette smoking, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pollution, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be bad for health)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(pollution, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be bad for health)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(pollution, be bad for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be bad for health)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(pollution, be bad for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be bad for health)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cigarette smoking, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(cigarette smoking, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(global warming, be bad for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(global warming, be bad for humans)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(carbon dioxide, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(carbon dioxide, be bad for environment)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(acid rain, be bad for human health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(acid rain, be bad for human health)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(acid rain, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(acid rain, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(global warming, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(global warming, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(acid rain, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(acid rain, be bad for environment)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(dust, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(dust, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(carbon dioxide, be bad for humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(carbon dioxide, be bad for humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(air pollution, be bad for health)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(air pollution, be bad for human health)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be bad for human health)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for human health)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be bad for environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be bad for animals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(air pollution, be bad for animals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for animals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad for human health)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(air pollution, be bad for environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad for environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad for animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for health)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad for health)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(pollution, be bad for environment)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(pollution, be bad for animals)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(pollution, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(pollution, be bad for humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(acid rain, be bad for human health)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(cigarette smoking, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(global warming, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(global warming, be bad for humans)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(dust, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(carbon dioxide, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(acid rain, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(acid rain, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(carbon dioxide, be bad for humans)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(pollution, be bad for environment)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(pollution, be bad for animals)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(pollution, be bad for humans)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(air pollution, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(pollution, has quality bad)