pollution: has quality bad

Related concepts

Parents	danger Weight: 0.59 , factor Weight: 0.59 , problem Weight: 0.59 , condition Weight: 0.58 , source Weight: 0.58
Siblings	air pollution Weight: 0.66 , smog Weight: 0.34 , thyroid problem Weight: 0.33 , overpopulation Weight: 0.32 , desertification Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality bad	1.00
has quality good	0.96
be bad for world	0.82
be bad for water	0.81
be bad for people	0.80
be bad for environment	0.80
be bad for air	0.79
be bad for human health	0.77
be bad for earth	0.76
has quality definition	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(source, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(pollution, has quality bad)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(source, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(pollution, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(pollution, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(source, has quality bad)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(pollution, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(source, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(source, has quality bad)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(source, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(smog, has quality bad)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(desertification, has quality bad)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Remarkable(smog, has quality good)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality good)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad)

...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(source, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(pollution, has quality bad)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(source, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(pollution, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(pollution, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

Remarkable(smog, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Plausible(smog, has quality good)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(pollution, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

Remarkable(smog, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Plausible(smog, has quality bad)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(pollution, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has quality good)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(pollution, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(desertification, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(desertification, has quality bad)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(pollution, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has quality bad)

...

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(pollution, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Salient(pollution, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(pollution, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(pollution, has quality good)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality good)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(pollution, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Salient(pollution, has quality good)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(pollution, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(pollution, has quality good)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(pollution, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Plausible(pollution, be bad for environment)

...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(pollution, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(pollution, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(pollution, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(pollution, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(source, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(smog, has quality good)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(smog, has quality bad)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(desertification, has quality bad)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(overpopulation, has quality bad)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(overpopulation, has quality good)

...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(pollution, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(source, has quality good)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(pollution, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)