pollution: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents danger
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, condition
Weight: 0.58
, source
Weight: 0.58
Siblings air pollution
Weight: 0.66
, smog
Weight: 0.34
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.33
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.32
, desertification
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
be bad for world 0.82
be bad for water 0.81
be bad for people 0.80
be bad for environment 0.80
be bad for air 0.79
be bad for human health 0.77
be bad for earth 0.76
has quality definition 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(pollution, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(pollution, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(source, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(source, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(smog, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(desertification, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(smog, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad for air)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for earth)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for human health)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(pollution, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(pollution, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(smog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(smog, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(smog, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(smog, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(desertification, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(desertification, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(smog, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(smog, be bad for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be bad for earth)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(smog, be bad for air)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(smog, be bad for air)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be bad for environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be bad for world)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for human health)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be bad for human health)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(pollution, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(pollution, has quality good)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality good)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(pollution, has quality good)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(pollution, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(pollution, be bad for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(pollution, be bad for world)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(pollution, be bad for earth)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(pollution, be bad for world)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(pollution, be bad for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(pollution, be bad for air)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(pollution, be bad for earth)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for world)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(pollution, be bad for air)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for earth)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(pollution, be bad for people)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for air)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(pollution, be bad for people)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(pollution, be bad for environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for people)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(pollution, be bad for earth)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(pollution, be bad for world)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(pollution, be bad for air)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(pollution, be bad for people)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(pollution, be bad for water)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(pollution, be bad for water)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(pollution, be bad for water)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(pollution, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(source, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(smog, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(smog, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(desertification, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(smog, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be bad for world)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(smog, be bad for air)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad for earth)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad for human health)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(source, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(pollution, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)