pollution: be bad for people

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents danger
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, condition
Weight: 0.58
, source
Weight: 0.58
Siblings air pollution
Weight: 0.66
, smog
Weight: 0.34
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.33
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.32
, desertification
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for people 1.00
be bad for world 0.85
be bad for water 0.85
hurt people 0.82
be bad for land 0.81
be bad for earth 0.81
be bad for environment 0.81
be bad for air 0.80
has quality bad 0.80
be bad for human health 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(pollution, be bad for people)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(source, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for earth)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad for air)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(smog, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(desertification, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for human health)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(pollution, be bad for people)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for earth)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be bad for earth)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(smog, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(smog, be bad for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(smog, be bad for air)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(smog, be bad for air)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be bad for environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be bad for world)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(smog, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(smog, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for human health)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be bad for human health)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(desertification, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(desertification, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(pollution, be bad for people)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(pollution, be bad for earth)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(pollution, be bad for earth)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(pollution, be bad for world)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(pollution, be bad for world)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for earth)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for world)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(pollution, be bad for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(pollution, be bad for air)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(pollution, be bad for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(pollution, be bad for air)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for air)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(pollution, be bad for earth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(pollution, be bad for environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(pollution, hurt people)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(pollution, hurt people)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(pollution, be bad for world)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(pollution, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(pollution, be bad for air)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(pollution, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(pollution, be bad for water)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(pollution, hurt people)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(pollution, be bad for water)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(pollution, be bad for water)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(pollution, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for water)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(pollution, hurt people)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(pollution, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(pollution, be bad for people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be bad for world)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad for earth)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(smog, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(smog, be bad for air)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(smog, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad for human health)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(desertification, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(pollution, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)