smog: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents air pollution
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, carbon monoxide
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.55
, issue
Weight: 0.53
Siblings carbon dioxide
Weight: 0.35
, acid rain
Weight: 0.34
, dust
Weight: 0.34
, mercury
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
be bad for environment 0.80
be bad for air 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(carbon monoxide, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(smog, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(carbon monoxide, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(smog, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(air pollution, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(smog, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(carbon monoxide, be bad for environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be bad for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(carbon monoxide, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dust, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(acid rain, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(acid rain, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(mercury, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(acid rain, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(carbon dioxide, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(carbon monoxide, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(smog, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(carbon monoxide, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(smog, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(air pollution, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(smog, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(acid rain, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(acid rain, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(dust, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(dust, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(mercury, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(mercury, be bad for environment)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(carbon dioxide, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(carbon dioxide, be bad for environment)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(acid rain, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(acid rain, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(acid rain, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(acid rain, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(smog, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(smog, has quality good)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(smog, has quality good)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(smog, has quality good)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(smog, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(smog, be bad for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(smog, be bad for environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(smog, be bad for air)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad for environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(smog, be bad for air)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad for air)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(smog, be bad for environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(smog, be bad for air)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(smog, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(smog, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad for environment)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(carbon monoxide, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(dust, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(acid rain, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(acid rain, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(mercury, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(carbon dioxide, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(acid rain, be bad for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(air pollution, be bad for environment)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(carbon monoxide, be bad for environment)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(smog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(carbon monoxide, has quality bad)