merger: have tax

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents deal
Weight: 0.69
, business activity
Weight: 0.60
, matter
Weight: 0.59
, development
Weight: 0.59
, agreement
Weight: 0.59
Siblings acquisition
Weight: 0.36
, takeover
Weight: 0.34
, partnership
Weight: 0.33
, incorporation
Weight: 0.32
, bankruptcy
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have tax 1.00
have free tax 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(merger, have tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(acquisition, have tax)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(merger, have tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(acquisition, have free tax)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(merger, have tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(acquisition, have tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(acquisition, have tax)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(merger, have tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(acquisition, have free tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(acquisition, have free tax)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(merger, have tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(merger, have tax)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(merger, have tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(merger, have free tax)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(merger, have tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(merger, have free tax)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(merger, have tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(merger, have free tax)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(merger, have tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(merger, have free tax)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(merger, have tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(merger, have tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(merger, have tax)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(merger, have tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(merger, have tax)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(merger, have tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(acquisition, have tax)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(merger, have tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(acquisition, have free tax)