metabolism: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.62
, chemical reaction
Weight: 0.61
, journal
Weight: 0.61
, topic
Weight: 0.59
, endocrine system
Weight: 0.57
Siblings glycolysis
Weight: 0.48
, catabolism
Weight: 0.43
, digestion
Weight: 0.36
, cellular respiration
Weight: 0.35
, photosynthesis
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
has quality change 0.86
has quality questions 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(chemical reaction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(metabolism, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(journal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(metabolism, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(chemical reaction, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(metabolism, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(journal, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(chemical reaction, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(chemical reaction, has quality questions)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(chemical reaction, has quality questions)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(chemical reaction, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(journal, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(digestion, has quality change)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(catabolism, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(digestion, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(chemical reaction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(metabolism, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(journal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(metabolism, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(chemical reaction, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(metabolism, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(digestion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(digestion, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(catabolism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(catabolism, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(digestion, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(digestion, has quality change)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(metabolism, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(metabolism, has quality bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(metabolism, has quality better)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, has quality bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(metabolism, has quality change)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(metabolism, has quality bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, has quality better)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(metabolism, has quality better)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(metabolism, has quality bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(metabolism, has quality change)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(metabolism, has quality better)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(metabolism, has quality change)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, has quality change)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(metabolism, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(chemical reaction, has quality questions)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(journal, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(chemical reaction, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(digestion, has quality change)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(catabolism, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(digestion, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(journal, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(chemical reaction, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(chemical reaction, has quality questions)