metal: be better conductor of heat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.66
, conductor
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
, hard rock
Weight: 0.62
, material
Weight: 0.61
Siblings beryllium
Weight: 0.72
, tantalum
Weight: 0.71
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.69
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.68
, cobalt
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better conductor of heat 1.00
be good conductor of heat 0.98
is heat conductor 0.97
make good heat conductor 0.97
is best heat conductor 0.97
make heat conductor 0.97
be better conductors of heat 0.94
is better heat conductors 0.94
be better conductors of heat energy 0.92
be good conductors brainly of heat 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(metal, be better conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, be good conductor of heat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(metal, be better conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(aluminum foil, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, be good conductor of heat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(metal, be better conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(metal, be better conductor of heat)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(metal, be better conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(metal, be good conductor of heat)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(metal, be better conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(metal, be better conductors of heat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(metal, be better conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(metal, be good conductor of heat)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(metal, be better conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(metal, be good conductor of heat)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(metal, be better conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(metal, be good conductor of heat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(metal, be better conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(metal, be better conductors of heat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(metal, be better conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(metal, be better conductors of heat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(metal, be better conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(metal, be better conductors of heat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(metal, be better conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(metal, be better conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(metal, be better conductor of heat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(metal, be better conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(metal, be better conductor of heat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(metal, be better conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, be good conductor of heat)