metal: be good conductor of heat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.66
, conductor
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
, hard rock
Weight: 0.62
, material
Weight: 0.61
Siblings beryllium
Weight: 0.72
, tantalum
Weight: 0.71
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.69
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.68
, cobalt
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good conductor of heat 1.00
make good heat conductor 0.99
be better conductor of heat 0.98
is heat conductor 0.98
make heat conductor 0.98
is best heat conductor 0.97
be good conductors brainly of heat 0.93
be good conductors of heat 0.93
is good heat conductors 0.93
make good conductors of heat 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(metal, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, be good conductor of heat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(metal, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(aluminum foil, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, be good conductor of heat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(metal, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(metal, be good conductor of heat)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(metal, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(metal, be better conductor of heat)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(metal, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(metal, be good conductors of heat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(metal, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(metal, be better conductor of heat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(metal, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(metal, be good conductors of heat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(metal, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(metal, be better conductor of heat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(metal, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(metal, be better conductor of heat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(metal, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(metal, be good conductors of heat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(metal, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(metal, be good conductors of heat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(metal, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(metal, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(metal, be good conductor of heat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(metal, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(metal, be good conductor of heat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(metal, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, be good conductor of heat)