metal: be better conductor than wood

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.66
, conductor
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
, hard rock
Weight: 0.62
, material
Weight: 0.61
Siblings beryllium
Weight: 0.72
, tantalum
Weight: 0.71
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.69
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.68
, cobalt
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better conductor than wood 1.00
be better conductor than plastic 0.91
be worse conductor than metal 0.91
be better electric conductor than metal 0.89
be better conductors than glass 0.87
be better electric conductor than hot metal 0.87
is good conductor 0.87
be better conductors than non-metals 0.86
be much better thermal conductor than materials 0.85
be much better thermal conductor than other materials 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(metal, be better conductor than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good conductor)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(metal, be better conductor than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good conductor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is good conductor)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(metal, be better conductor than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(metal, be better conductor than wood)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(metal, be better conductor than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(metal, be better conductor than plastic)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(metal, be better conductor than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(metal, be better conductor than plastic)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(metal, be better conductor than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(metal, be better conductors than glass)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(metal, be better conductor than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(metal, be better conductors than glass)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(metal, be better conductor than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(metal, be better conductor than plastic)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(metal, be better conductor than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(metal, be better conductor than plastic)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(metal, be better conductor than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(metal, be better conductors than glass)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(metal, be better conductor than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(metal, be better conductors than glass)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(metal, be better conductor than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(metal, be better conductor than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(metal, be better conductor than wood)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(metal, be better conductor than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(metal, be better conductor than wood)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(metal, be better conductor than wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is good conductor)