meteorologist: use computers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scientist
Weight: 0.72
, thing
Weight: 0.51
, specialist
Weight: 0.50
, most people
Weight: 0.46
, researcher
Weight: 0.45
Siblings biologist
Weight: 0.36
, economist
Weight: 0.36
, geologist
Weight: 0.36
, astronomer
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
use computers 1.00
use computers make 0.97
use speed computers 0.93
use computer 0.92
use high speed computers 0.90
use computer models 0.85
depend heavily on computers 0.81
use supercomputers 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(scientist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(meteorologist, use computers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(scientist, use computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(meteorologist, use computers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(scientist, use computer models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(meteorologist, use computers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(scientist, use computer)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(scientist, use computers)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(scientist, use computer models)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(scientist, use computers)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(scientist, use computer)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(scientist, use computer models)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(biologist, use computers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(scientist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(meteorologist, use computers)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(scientist, use computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(meteorologist, use computers)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(scientist, use computer models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(meteorologist, use computers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(biologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(biologist, use computers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(meteorologist, use computers)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(meteorologist, use computers make)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(meteorologist, use computers make)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(meteorologist, use computers make)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(meteorologist, use computer)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(meteorologist, use computer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(meteorologist, use computer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(meteorologist, use computers make)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(meteorologist, use computer models)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(meteorologist, use computer)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(meteorologist, use computer models)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(meteorologist, use computer models)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(meteorologist, use computer models)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(meteorologist, use high speed computers)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(meteorologist, use supercomputers)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(meteorologist, use high speed computers)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(meteorologist, use high speed computers)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(meteorologist, use high speed computers)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(meteorologist, depend heavily on computers)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(meteorologist, use supercomputers)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(meteorologist, use supercomputers)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(meteorologist, use supercomputers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(meteorologist, use computers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(meteorologist, use computers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(scientist, use computers)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(scientist, use computer)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(scientist, use computer models)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(biologist, use computers)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(scientist, use computers)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(scientist, use computer)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(meteorologist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(scientist, use computer models)