method: be important in psychology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents approach
Weight: 0.72
, standard
Weight: 0.66
, option
Weight: 0.65
, tool
Weight: 0.61
Siblings algorithm
Weight: 0.69
, extraction
Weight: 0.67
, strategy
Weight: 0.67
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.66
, spray
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in psychology 1.00
be to psychology 0.97
be important in sociology 0.88
be important in computer science 0.77
be necessary in science 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(approach, be to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(method, be important in psychology)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(standard, be necessary in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(method, be important in psychology)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(method, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(approach, be to psychology)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(method, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(standard, be necessary in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(method, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(approach, be to psychology)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(method, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(standard, be necessary in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(method, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important in computer science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(approach, be to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(method, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(method, be important in psychology)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(standard, be necessary in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(method, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(method, be important in psychology)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(method, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(algorithm, be important in computer science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(algorithm, be important in computer science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(method, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(method, be important in psychology)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(method, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(method, be important in sociology)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(method, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(method, be important in sociology)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(method, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(method, be important in sociology)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(method, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(method, be important in sociology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(method, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(method, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(method, be important in psychology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(method, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(method, be important in psychology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(method, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(standard, be necessary in science)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(method, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(approach, be to psychology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(method, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(algorithm, be important in computer science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(method, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(approach, be to psychology)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(method, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(standard, be necessary in science)