method: were used in modern germany

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents approach
Weight: 0.72
, standard
Weight: 0.66
, option
Weight: 0.65
, tool
Weight: 0.61
Siblings algorithm
Weight: 0.69
, extraction
Weight: 0.67
, strategy
Weight: 0.67
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.66
, spray
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
were used in modern germany 1.00
were used in early modern germany 0.98
were used in germany 0.95
were used in early germany 0.92
be illegal in japan 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(method, were used in modern germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(spray, be illegal in japan)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(method, were used in modern germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(spray, be illegal in japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(spray, be illegal in japan)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(method, were used in modern germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(method, were used in modern germany)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(method, were used in modern germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(method, were used in early modern germany)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(method, were used in modern germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(method, were used in early modern germany)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(method, were used in modern germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(method, were used in germany)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(method, were used in modern germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(method, were used in germany)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(method, were used in modern germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(method, were used in early modern germany)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(method, were used in modern germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(method, were used in early germany)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(method, were used in modern germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(method, were used in early germany)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(method, were used in modern germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(method, were used in germany)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(method, were used in modern germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(method, were used in early germany)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(method, were used in modern germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(method, were used in early modern germany)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(method, were used in modern germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(method, were used in germany)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(method, were used in modern germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(method, were used in early germany)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(method, were used in modern germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(method, were used in modern germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(method, were used in modern germany)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(method, were used in modern germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(method, were used in modern germany)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(method, were used in modern germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(spray, be illegal in japan)