method: were used in germany

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents approach
Weight: 0.72
, standard
Weight: 0.66
, option
Weight: 0.65
, tool
Weight: 0.61
Siblings algorithm
Weight: 0.69
, extraction
Weight: 0.67
, strategy
Weight: 0.67
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.66
, spray
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
were used in germany 1.00
were used in early germany 0.97
were used in modern germany 0.95
were used in early modern germany 0.93
be illegal in japan 0.78
be in greece 0.77
be illegal in canada 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.12
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(standard, be in greece) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(method, were used in germany)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(option, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(method, were used in germany)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(method, were used in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(standard, be in greece)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(method, were used in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(option, be illegal in canada)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(method, were used in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(option, be illegal in canada)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(method, were used in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(standard, be in greece)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(method, were used in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(spray, be illegal in japan)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(standard, be in greece) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(method, were used in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(method, were used in germany)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(option, be illegal in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(method, were used in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(method, were used in germany)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(method, were used in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(spray, be illegal in japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(spray, be illegal in japan)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(method, were used in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(method, were used in germany)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(method, were used in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(method, were used in early germany)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(method, were used in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(method, were used in early germany)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(method, were used in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(method, were used in modern germany)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(method, were used in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(method, were used in modern germany)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(method, were used in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(method, were used in early modern germany)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(method, were used in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(method, were used in early germany)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(method, were used in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(method, were used in early modern germany)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(method, were used in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(method, were used in modern germany)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(method, were used in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(method, were used in early modern germany)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(method, were used in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(method, were used in early germany)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(method, were used in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(method, were used in modern germany)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(method, were used in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(method, were used in early modern germany)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(method, were used in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(method, were used in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(method, were used in germany)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(method, were used in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(method, were used in germany)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(method, were used in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(standard, be in greece)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(method, were used in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(option, be illegal in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(method, were used in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(spray, be illegal in japan)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(method, were used in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(standard, be in greece)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(method, were used in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(option, be illegal in canada)