option: be illegal in canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents solution
Weight: 0.64
, consideration
Weight: 0.63
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, exchange
Weight: 0.60
Siblings stock option
Weight: 0.85
, lock
Weight: 0.68
, method
Weight: 0.65
, pay
Weight: 0.64
, time zone
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be illegal in canada 1.00
promote change in canada 0.85
be in usa 0.82
be in uk 0.80
is illegal 0.80
is uk 0.79
be in uk low 0.78
be low in uk 0.78
harm mexico 0.77
were used in germany 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(factor, promote change in canada)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(option, be illegal in canada)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(factor, harm mexico)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(option, be illegal in canada)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(option, be illegal in canada)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(factor, harm mexico)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(option, be illegal in canada)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(factor, promote change in canada)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(option, be illegal in canada)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(factor, promote change in canada)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(option, be illegal in canada)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(factor, harm mexico)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(option, be illegal in canada)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(time zone, be in usa)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(option, be illegal in canada)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(pay, be in uk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(option, be illegal in canada)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pay, be in uk low)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(option, be illegal in canada)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(pay, be low in uk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(option, be illegal in canada)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(pay, is uk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(option, be illegal in canada)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(method, were used in germany)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(factor, promote change in canada)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(option, be illegal in canada)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(option, be illegal in canada)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(factor, harm mexico)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(option, be illegal in canada)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(option, be illegal in canada)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(option, be illegal in canada)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(time zone, be in usa)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(time zone, be in usa)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(option, be illegal in canada)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(pay, is uk)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(pay, is uk)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(option, be illegal in canada)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(pay, be in uk)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(pay, be in uk)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(option, be illegal in canada)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(pay, be low in uk)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(pay, be low in uk)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(option, be illegal in canada)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(pay, be in uk low)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(pay, be in uk low)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(option, be illegal in canada)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(method, were used in germany)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(method, were used in germany)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(option, be illegal in canada)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(option, be illegal in canada)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(option, be illegal in canada)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(option, is illegal)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(option, be illegal in canada)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(option, is illegal)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(option, be illegal in canada)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(option, is illegal)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(option, be illegal in canada)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(option, is illegal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(option, be illegal in canada)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(option, be illegal in canada)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(option, be illegal in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(option, be illegal in canada)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(option, be illegal in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(option, be illegal in canada)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(factor, promote change in canada)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(option, be illegal in canada)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(factor, harm mexico)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(option, be illegal in canada)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(time zone, be in usa)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(option, be illegal in canada)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(pay, is uk)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(option, be illegal in canada)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(pay, be in uk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(option, be illegal in canada)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pay, be in uk low)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(option, be illegal in canada)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(pay, be low in uk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(option, be illegal in canada)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(method, were used in germany)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(option, be illegal in canada)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(factor, promote change in canada)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(option, be illegal in canada)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(factor, harm mexico)