mexican food: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food
Weight: 0.69
, restaurant
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, mexico
Weight: 0.57
Siblings taco bell
Weight: 0.70
, tamale
Weight: 0.68
, tortilla
Weight: 0.66
, burrito
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is best 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mexican food, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mexican food, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(mexico, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mexican food, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(food, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(food, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(mexico, is best)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(mexico, is best)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tortilla, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(burrito, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is best)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tamale, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(mexican food, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(mexican food, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(mexico, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(mexican food, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(tamale, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(tamale, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(burrito, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(burrito, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(taco bell, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(taco bell, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tortilla, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(tortilla, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(taco bell, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(taco bell, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(taco bell, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(taco bell, is best)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(mexican food, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(mexican food, has quality bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mexican food, has quality bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(mexican food, has quality bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(mexican food, is best)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mexican food, is best)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(mexican food, is best)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, is best)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mexican food, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(mexico, is best)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(tamale, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(tortilla, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(burrito, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(taco bell, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(taco bell, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(taco bell, is best)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(mexican food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(mexico, is best)