mexican food: is best

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food
Weight: 0.69
, restaurant
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, mexico
Weight: 0.57
Siblings taco bell
Weight: 0.70
, tamale
Weight: 0.68
, tortilla
Weight: 0.66
, burrito
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best 1.00
be best food in world 0.84
has quality good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(mexico, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mexican food, is best)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mexican food, is best)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mexican food, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(mexico, is best)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mexican food, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(mexico, is best)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is best)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(burrito, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tamale, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(mexico, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(mexican food, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(mexican food, is best)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(mexican food, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(mexican food, is best)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mexican food, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(taco bell, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(taco bell, is best)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mexican food, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(tamale, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(tamale, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mexican food, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(burrito, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(burrito, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mexican food, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(taco bell, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(taco bell, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mexican food, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(mexican food, is best)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(mexican food, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(mexican food, be best food in world)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mexican food, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mexican food, be best food in world)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mexican food, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(mexican food, be best food in world)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(mexican food, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(mexican food, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mexican food, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mexican food, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(mexican food, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, be best food in world)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mexican food, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(mexican food, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(mexican food, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(mexican food, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mexican food, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, is best)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mexican food, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mexican food, is best)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(mexico, is best)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(tamale, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(taco bell, is best)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(burrito, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(taco bell, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mexican food, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(mexico, is best)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(mexican food, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)