mexico city: is cold

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents latin america
Weight: 0.75
, city
Weight: 0.71
, place
Weight: 0.66
, country
Weight: 0.65
Siblings san francisco
Weight: 0.69
, guadalajara
Weight: 0.46
, quebec city
Weight: 0.40
, mexico
Weight: 0.39
, north america
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is cold 1.00
be colder than veracruz 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(quebec city, is cold)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is cold)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(mexico city, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(san francisco, is cold)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(mexico city, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(quebec city, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(quebec city, is cold)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(mexico city, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(mexico city, is cold)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(mexico city, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(mexico city, be colder than veracruz)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(mexico city, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mexico city, be colder than veracruz)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(mexico city, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(mexico city, be colder than veracruz)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(mexico city, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be colder than veracruz)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(mexico city, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(mexico city, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, is cold)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(mexico city, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(mexico city, is cold)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(san francisco, is cold)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(quebec city, is cold)