san francisco: is cold

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents san diego
Weight: 0.83
, los angeles
Weight: 0.74
, mexico city
Weight: 0.69
, north america
Weight: 0.67
Siblings san jose
Weight: 0.80
, vancouver
Weight: 0.62
, des moines
Weight: 0.61
, seattle
Weight: 0.60
, exploratorium
Weight: 0.43

Related properties

Property Similarity
is cold 1.00
be cold year 0.90
have cold days 0.89
be warm in winter 0.83
is warm 0.81
be warmer in winter 0.80
have warm winters 0.80
be colder than veracruz 0.77
get in winter 0.76
is humid 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(mexico city, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(san francisco, is cold)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(north america, have cold days) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(san francisco, is cold)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(san diego, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(san francisco, is cold)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(los angeles, is humid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(san francisco, is cold)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(san diego, is humid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(san francisco, is cold)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(mexico city, be colder than veracruz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(san francisco, is cold)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(san diego, is cold)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(mexico city, is cold)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(mexico city, be colder than veracruz)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(north america, have cold days)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(san diego, is humid)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(los angeles, is humid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(north america, have cold days)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, is cold)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, is humid)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(san diego, is humid)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be colder than veracruz)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(san diego, is cold)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(vancouver, have warm winters)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(vancouver, be cold year)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(vancouver, get in winter)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(seattle, is warm)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(vancouver, is warm)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(seattle, is cold)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(mexico city, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(san francisco, is cold)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(san diego, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(san francisco, is cold)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(north america, have cold days) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(san francisco, is cold)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(los angeles, is humid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(san francisco, is cold)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(san diego, is humid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(san francisco, is cold)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(mexico city, be colder than veracruz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(san francisco, is cold)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(seattle, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(seattle, is cold)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(vancouver, be cold year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(vancouver, be cold year)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(vancouver, is warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(vancouver, is warm)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(vancouver, have warm winters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(vancouver, have warm winters)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(seattle, is warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(seattle, is warm)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(vancouver, get in winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(vancouver, get in winter)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(san francisco, is cold)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be warmer in winter)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be warm in winter)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(san francisco, be warmer in winter)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(san francisco, be warm in winter)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(san francisco, be warmer in winter)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(san francisco, be warm in winter)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(san francisco, be warmer in winter)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(san francisco, be warm in winter)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is cold)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(san francisco, is cold)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(san diego, is cold)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mexico city, be colder than veracruz)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(mexico city, is cold)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(north america, have cold days)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(san diego, is humid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(los angeles, is humid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(seattle, is cold)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(vancouver, have warm winters)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(vancouver, get in winter)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(seattle, is warm)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(vancouver, is warm)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(vancouver, be cold year)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(san diego, is cold)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(mexico city, is cold)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mexico city, be colder than veracruz)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(north america, have cold days)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(san diego, is humid)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(san francisco, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(los angeles, is humid)