vancouver: is warm

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents north america
Weight: 0.68
, san francisco
Weight: 0.62
, city
Weight: 0.60
, canada
Weight: 0.57
, washington
Weight: 0.57
Siblings south america
Weight: 0.37
, latin america
Weight: 0.37
, central america
Weight: 0.36
, boston
Weight: 0.35
, san diego
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is warm 1.00
have warm winters 0.85
be cold year 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(vancouver, is warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(boston, is warm)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(vancouver, is warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(boston, is warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(boston, is warm)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(vancouver, is warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(vancouver, is warm)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(vancouver, is warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(vancouver, have warm winters)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(vancouver, is warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(vancouver, have warm winters)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(vancouver, is warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(vancouver, have warm winters)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(vancouver, is warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(vancouver, have warm winters)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(vancouver, is warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(vancouver, be cold year)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(vancouver, is warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(vancouver, be cold year)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(vancouver, is warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(vancouver, be cold year)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(vancouver, is warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(vancouver, be cold year)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(vancouver, is warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(vancouver, is warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(vancouver, is warm)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(vancouver, is warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(vancouver, is warm)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(vancouver, is warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(boston, is warm)