michael jackson: was successfull

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents jackson
Weight: 0.75
, legend
Weight: 0.66
, man
Weight: 0.65
, celebrity
Weight: 0.65
Siblings michael
Weight: 0.39
, michael jordan
Weight: 0.38
, adam smith
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
was successfull 1.00
was succesful 0.85
was successful 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(michael jackson, was successfull) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(michael jordan, was successful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(michael jackson, was successfull) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(michael jordan, was successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(michael jordan, was successful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(michael jackson, was successfull) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(michael jackson, was successfull)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(michael jackson, was successfull) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(michael jackson, was succesful)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(michael jackson, was successfull) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(michael jackson, was successful)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(michael jackson, was successfull) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(michael jackson, was succesful)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(michael jackson, was successfull) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(michael jackson, was successful)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(michael jackson, was successfull) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(michael jackson, was succesful)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(michael jackson, was successfull) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(michael jackson, was successful)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(michael jackson, was successfull) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(michael jackson, was succesful)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(michael jackson, was successfull) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(michael jackson, was successful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(michael jackson, was successfull) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(michael jackson, was successfull) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(michael jackson, was successfull)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(michael jackson, was successfull) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(michael jackson, was successfull)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(michael jackson, was successfull) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(michael jordan, was successful)