microphone: be used as output device

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.64
, sound
Weight: 0.63
, instrument
Weight: 0.63
, voice
Weight: 0.63
Siblings camera
Weight: 0.36
, digital camera
Weight: 0.35
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.35
, keyboard
Weight: 0.34
, camera lens
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used as output device 1.00
be input device 0.80
is input device 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(microphone, be used as output device)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(camera, be input device)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(microphone, be used as output device)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(camera, is input device)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(microphone, be used as output device)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be input device)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(microphone, be used as output device)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, is input device)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(microphone, be used as output device)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(keyboard, is input device)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(microphone, be used as output device)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(keyboard, is input device)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(keyboard, is input device)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(microphone, be used as output device)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(digital camera, is input device)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(digital camera, is input device)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(microphone, be used as output device)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(digital camera, be input device)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be input device)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(microphone, be used as output device)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(camera, is input device)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(camera, is input device)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(microphone, be used as output device)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(camera, be input device)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(camera, be input device)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(microphone, be used as output device)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(microphone, be used as output device)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(microphone, be used as output device)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(microphone, be input device)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(microphone, be used as output device)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(microphone, is input device)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(microphone, be used as output device)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(microphone, is input device)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(microphone, be used as output device)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(microphone, be input device)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(microphone, be used as output device)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(microphone, is input device)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(microphone, be used as output device)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(microphone, be used as output device)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(microphone, be used as output device)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(microphone, be used as output device)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(microphone, be used as output device)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(microphone, be used as output device)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(digital camera, is input device)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(microphone, be used as output device)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(digital camera, be input device)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(microphone, be used as output device)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(keyboard, is input device)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(microphone, be used as output device)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(camera, is input device)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(microphone, be used as output device)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(camera, be input device)