microphone: feedback

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.64
, sound
Weight: 0.63
, instrument
Weight: 0.63
, voice
Weight: 0.63
Siblings camera
Weight: 0.36
, digital camera
Weight: 0.35
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.35
, keyboard
Weight: 0.34
, camera lens
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
feedback 1.00
be input device 0.77
is input device 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(microphone, feedback)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(camera, be input device)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(microphone, feedback)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(camera, is input device)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(microphone, feedback)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be input device)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(microphone, feedback)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, is input device)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(microphone, feedback)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(keyboard, is input device)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(microphone, feedback)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(keyboard, is input device)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(keyboard, is input device)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(microphone, feedback)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(digital camera, is input device)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(digital camera, is input device)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(microphone, feedback)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(digital camera, be input device)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be input device)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(microphone, feedback)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(camera, is input device)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(camera, is input device)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(microphone, feedback)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(camera, be input device)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(camera, be input device)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(microphone, feedback)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(microphone, feedback)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(microphone, feedback)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(microphone, is input device)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(microphone, feedback)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(microphone, be input device)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(microphone, feedback)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(microphone, is input device)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(microphone, feedback)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(microphone, be input device)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(microphone, feedback)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(microphone, be input device)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(microphone, feedback)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(microphone, is input device)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(microphone, feedback)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(microphone, be input device)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(microphone, feedback)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(microphone, is input device)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(microphone, feedback)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(microphone, feedback)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(microphone, feedback)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(microphone, feedback)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(microphone, feedback)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(microphone, feedback)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(digital camera, is input device)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(microphone, feedback)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(digital camera, be input device)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(microphone, feedback)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(keyboard, is input device)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(microphone, feedback)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(camera, is input device)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(microphone, feedback)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(camera, be input device)