microsoft: be more successful than apple

Related concepts

Parents	os Weight: 0.69 , software company Weight: 0.65 , giant Weight: 0.63 , xml Weight: 0.60
Siblings	azure Weight: 0.47 , solaris Weight: 0.39 , freebsd Weight: 0.38 , unix Weight: 0.38 , linux Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be more successful than apple	1.00
be more popular than apple	0.95
be better than apple	0.93
be at apple event	0.82
beat apple	0.80
be successful	0.78
is successful	0.78
was successful	0.77
be better than ms-dos	0.77
be better than vice-versa	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(microsoft, be more successful than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(unix, was successful)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(microsoft, be more successful than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(linux, be better than ms-dos)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(microsoft, be more successful than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(linux, be better than ms-dos) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(linux, be better than ms-dos)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(microsoft, be more successful than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(unix, was successful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Plausible(unix, was successful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(microsoft, be more successful than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Salient(microsoft, be more successful than apple)

Similarity expansion

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(microsoft, be more successful than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Plausible(microsoft, be more popular than apple)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.14

Salient(microsoft, be more successful than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Salient(microsoft, be more popular than apple)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(microsoft, be more successful than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(microsoft, be better than apple)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(microsoft, be more successful than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(microsoft, be more popular than apple)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.14

Salient(microsoft, be more successful than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Salient(microsoft, be better than apple)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(microsoft, be more successful than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(microsoft, be better than apple)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.14

Salient(microsoft, be more successful than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Salient(microsoft, beat apple)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(microsoft, be more successful than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(microsoft, beat apple)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(microsoft, be more successful than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Plausible(microsoft, beat apple)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.35

Typical(microsoft, be more successful than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(microsoft, be better than apple)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.35

Typical(microsoft, be more successful than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(microsoft, be more popular than apple)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.35

Typical(microsoft, be more successful than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(microsoft, beat apple)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.35

Typical(microsoft, be more successful than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(microsoft, be successful)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(microsoft, be more successful than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(microsoft, be successful)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(microsoft, be more successful than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(microsoft, be successful)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.14

Salient(microsoft, be more successful than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(microsoft, be successful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.14

Salient(microsoft, be more successful than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(microsoft, be more successful than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(microsoft, be more successful than apple)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(microsoft, be more successful than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(microsoft, be more successful than apple)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(microsoft, be more successful than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(linux, be better than ms-dos)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(microsoft, be more successful than apple) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(unix, was successful)