milwaukee: be bad for people

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.60
, market
Weight: 0.60
, county
Weight: 0.58
, school district
Weight: 0.56
Siblings lake geneva
Weight: 0.48
, springfield
Weight: 0.35
, mexico city
Weight: 0.35
, memphis
Weight: 0.35
, lincoln
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for people 1.00
be bad for black people 0.92
is poor 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(milwaukee, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(memphis, is poor)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(milwaukee, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(memphis, is poor)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(memphis, is poor)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(milwaukee, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(milwaukee, be bad for people)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(milwaukee, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(milwaukee, be bad for black people)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(milwaukee, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(milwaukee, be bad for black people)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(milwaukee, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(milwaukee, be bad for black people)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(milwaukee, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(milwaukee, be bad for black people)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(milwaukee, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(milwaukee, is poor)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(milwaukee, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(milwaukee, is poor)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(milwaukee, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(milwaukee, is poor)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(milwaukee, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(milwaukee, is poor)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(milwaukee, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(milwaukee, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(milwaukee, be bad for people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(milwaukee, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(milwaukee, be bad for people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(milwaukee, be bad for people)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(memphis, is poor)