mining: affect environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents enterprise
Weight: 0.61
, sector
Weight: 0.61
, business activity
Weight: 0.60
, environment
Weight: 0.59
, occupation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings oil company
Weight: 0.34
, miner
Weight: 0.33
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.33
, banking industry
Weight: 0.32
, agriculture
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect environment 1.00
be bad for environment 0.87
be good for environment 0.87
affect system 0.83
affect micmac culture 0.82
affect culture 0.82
affect positively and negatively biosphere 0.81
affect business of organisation 0.81
affect business 0.81
affect economy 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(environment, affect micmac culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(mining, affect environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(environment, affect culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(mining, affect environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(mining, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(environment, affect culture)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(mining, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(environment, affect micmac culture)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect micmac culture)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect culture)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, affect positively and negatively biosphere)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(oil company, be bad for environment)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, affect environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(environment, affect micmac culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mining, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(mining, affect environment)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(environment, affect culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mining, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(mining, affect environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(mining, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(agriculture, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(agriculture, affect environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(mining, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(agriculture, affect positively and negatively biosphere) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(agriculture, affect positively and negatively biosphere)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(mining, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(oil company, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(oil company, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(mining, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(mining, affect environment)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mining, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect economy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(mining, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(mining, affect economy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(mining, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(mining, affect economy)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(mining, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(mining, affect economy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(mining, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(mining, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(mining, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(mining, affect environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(environment, affect culture)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(environment, affect micmac culture)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(agriculture, affect environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(agriculture, affect positively and negatively biosphere)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mining, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(oil company, be bad for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(mining, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(environment, affect culture)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(mining, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(environment, affect micmac culture)