minneapolis: is cold

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.56
, wisconsin
Weight: 0.55
, airport
Weight: 0.55
Siblings sacramento
Weight: 0.34
, milwaukee
Weight: 0.34
, new york city
Weight: 0.34
, michigan
Weight: 0.34
, lincoln
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is cold 1.00
get cold 0.96
is humid weather 0.79
be humid in summer 0.76
is humid 0.76
is weather 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(wisconsin, is cold)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(minneapolis, is cold)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(wisconsin, is humid)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(minneapolis, is cold)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(wisconsin, is weather)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(minneapolis, is cold)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, is cold)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, is weather)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, is humid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is humid)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is cold)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is weather)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(milwaukee, is humid)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(new york city, is humid)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is cold)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(wisconsin, is cold)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(minneapolis, is cold)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(wisconsin, is humid)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(minneapolis, is cold)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(wisconsin, is weather)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(minneapolis, is cold)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(michigan, is cold)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(michigan, is cold)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(milwaukee, is humid)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(milwaukee, is humid)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(new york city, is humid)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(new york city, is humid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(minneapolis, is cold)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, get cold)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(minneapolis, get cold)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is humid weather)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, be humid in summer)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is humid)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(minneapolis, get cold)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is weather)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(minneapolis, get cold)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(minneapolis, is weather)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(minneapolis, is humid weather)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(minneapolis, be humid in summer)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(minneapolis, is weather)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(minneapolis, is weather)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(minneapolis, is humid)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(minneapolis, is humid weather)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(minneapolis, be humid in summer)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(minneapolis, is humid)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(minneapolis, is humid weather)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(minneapolis, is humid)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(minneapolis, be humid in summer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is cold)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(minneapolis, is cold)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is cold)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is weather)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is humid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(michigan, is cold)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(milwaukee, is humid)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(new york city, is humid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is cold)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is weather)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(minneapolis, is cold)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is humid)