minneapolis: is humid weather

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.56
, wisconsin
Weight: 0.55
, airport
Weight: 0.55
Siblings sacramento
Weight: 0.34
, milwaukee
Weight: 0.34
, new york city
Weight: 0.34
, michigan
Weight: 0.34
, lincoln
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is humid weather 1.00
is humid 0.96
be humid in summer 0.93
is weather 0.90
is cold 0.79
get cold 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(wisconsin, is humid)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(minneapolis, is humid weather)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(wisconsin, is weather)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(minneapolis, is humid weather)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(wisconsin, is cold)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(minneapolis, is humid weather)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(minneapolis, is humid weather)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, is humid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(minneapolis, is humid weather)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, is weather)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(minneapolis, is humid weather)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, is cold)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is humid weather)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is humid)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is humid weather)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is weather)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is humid weather)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is cold)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is humid weather)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(milwaukee, is humid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is humid weather)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(new york city, is humid)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is humid weather)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is cold)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(wisconsin, is humid)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(minneapolis, is humid weather)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(minneapolis, is humid weather)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(wisconsin, is weather)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(minneapolis, is humid weather)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(minneapolis, is humid weather)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(wisconsin, is cold)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(minneapolis, is humid weather)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(minneapolis, is humid weather)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(minneapolis, is humid weather)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(milwaukee, is humid)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(milwaukee, is humid)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(minneapolis, is humid weather)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(new york city, is humid)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(new york city, is humid)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(minneapolis, is humid weather)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(michigan, is cold)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(michigan, is cold)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(minneapolis, is humid weather)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(minneapolis, is humid weather)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(minneapolis, is humid weather)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(minneapolis, is humid)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(minneapolis, is humid weather)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(minneapolis, is weather)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(minneapolis, is humid weather)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(minneapolis, be humid in summer)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(minneapolis, is humid weather)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(minneapolis, is humid)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(minneapolis, is humid weather)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(minneapolis, is weather)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(minneapolis, is humid weather)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(minneapolis, is humid weather)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is humid weather)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(minneapolis, is humid weather)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(minneapolis, is humid weather)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is humid weather)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is weather)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is humid weather)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is cold)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is humid weather)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is humid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is humid weather)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(milwaukee, is humid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is humid weather)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(michigan, is cold)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(minneapolis, is humid weather)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(new york city, is humid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(minneapolis, is humid weather)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is weather)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(minneapolis, is humid weather)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is humid)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(minneapolis, is humid weather)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is cold)