mit: is best

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents institution
Weight: 0.55
, organization
Weight: 0.55
, university
Weight: 0.53
, site
Weight: 0.53
, school
Weight: 0.51
Siblings cambridge
Weight: 0.31
, ted
Weight: 0.31
, un
Weight: 0.31
, ubs
Weight: 0.30
, ac
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best 1.00
be best university in world 0.81
is best university 0.80
has quality good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(school, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(mit, is best)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(school, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(mit, is best)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(university, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(mit, is best)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mit, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(school, is best)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mit, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(university, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mit, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(school, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(mit, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(school, is best)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(mit, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(university, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(mit, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(school, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(mit, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(un, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(mit, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(cambridge, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(school, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(mit, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(mit, is best)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(school, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(mit, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(mit, is best)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(university, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(mit, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(mit, is best)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mit, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(cambridge, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(cambridge, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mit, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(un, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(un, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mit, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(mit, is best)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(mit, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(mit, be best university in world)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(mit, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(mit, is best university)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(mit, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(mit, be best university in world)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(mit, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mit, is best university)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(mit, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(mit, be best university in world)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(mit, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(mit, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(mit, is best)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mit, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(mit, is best)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(mit, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(school, is best)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(mit, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(university, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(mit, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(school, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(mit, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(cambridge, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(mit, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(un, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(mit, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(school, is best)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(mit, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(university, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(mit, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(school, has quality good)