mode: be hard on normal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents condition
Weight: 0.60
, concept
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, setting
Weight: 0.58
Siblings arcade
Weight: 0.65
, survival
Weight: 0.62
, default
Weight: 0.61
, cbc
Weight: 0.57
, overlay
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
be hard on normal 1.00
be hard on even normal 0.98
is hard 0.82
were difficult in andersonville 0.76
be good 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(setting, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(mode, be hard on normal)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(concept, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(mode, be hard on normal)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(condition, were difficult in andersonville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(mode, be hard on normal)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(mode, be hard on normal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(concept, is hard)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(mode, be hard on normal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(condition, were difficult in andersonville)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(mode, be hard on normal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(setting, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(mode, be hard on normal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(setting, is hard)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(mode, be hard on normal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(condition, were difficult in andersonville)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(mode, be hard on normal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(concept, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(mode, be hard on normal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(survival, be good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(setting, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(mode, be hard on normal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(mode, be hard on normal)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(concept, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(mode, be hard on normal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(mode, be hard on normal)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(condition, were difficult in andersonville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(mode, be hard on normal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(mode, be hard on normal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(mode, be hard on normal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(survival, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(survival, be good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(mode, be hard on normal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(mode, be hard on normal)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(mode, be hard on normal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(mode, be hard on even normal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(mode, be hard on normal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(mode, be hard on even normal)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(mode, be hard on normal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(mode, be hard on even normal)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(mode, be hard on normal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(mode, be hard on even normal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(mode, be hard on normal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(mode, be hard on normal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(mode, be hard on normal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(mode, be hard on normal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(mode, be hard on normal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(mode, be hard on normal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(concept, is hard)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(mode, be hard on normal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(setting, is hard)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(mode, be hard on normal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(condition, were difficult in andersonville)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(mode, be hard on normal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(survival, be good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(mode, be hard on normal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(concept, is hard)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(mode, be hard on normal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(setting, is hard)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(mode, be hard on normal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(condition, were difficult in andersonville)