model: be helpful in science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents example
Weight: 0.65
, solution
Weight: 0.64
, approach
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.62
Siblings honda civic
Weight: 0.66
, bmw
Weight: 0.64
, theory
Weight: 0.63
, platform
Weight: 0.62
, hybrid
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be helpful in science 1.00
be useful in science 0.95
be beneficial for science 0.92
be useful in earth science 0.91
be important in science 0.91
be helpful in mathematics 0.90
be used in science 0.88
be necessary in science 0.88
be useful in biology 0.87
be important in earth science 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(model, be helpful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(theory, be used in science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(model, be helpful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(theory, be used in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(theory, be used in science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(model, be helpful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(model, be helpful in science)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(model, be helpful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(model, be helpful in mathematics)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(model, be helpful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(model, be useful in earth science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(model, be helpful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(model, be useful in science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(model, be helpful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(model, be helpful in mathematics)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(model, be helpful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(model, be helpful in mathematics)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(model, be helpful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(model, be useful in earth science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(model, be helpful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(model, be used in science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(model, be helpful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(model, be used in science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(model, be helpful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(model, be useful in science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(model, be helpful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(model, be useful in earth science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(model, be helpful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(model, be used in science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(model, be helpful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(model, be important in earth science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(model, be helpful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(model, be used in science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(model, be helpful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(model, be useful in science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(model, be helpful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(model, be necessary in science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(model, be helpful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(model, be used in science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(model, be helpful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(model, be used in science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(model, be helpful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(model, be helpful in mathematics)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(model, be helpful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(model, be useful in earth science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(model, be helpful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(model, be necessary in science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(model, be helpful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(model, be important in earth science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(model, be helpful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(model, be necessary in science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(model, be helpful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(model, be important in earth science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(model, be helpful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(model, be useful in science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(model, be helpful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(model, be important in earth science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(model, be helpful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(model, be used in science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(model, be helpful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(model, be used in science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(model, be helpful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(model, be necessary in science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(model, be helpful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(model, be helpful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(model, be helpful in science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(model, be helpful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(model, be helpful in science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(model, be helpful in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(theory, be used in science)