model: be in current atomic theory

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents example
Weight: 0.65
, solution
Weight: 0.64
, approach
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.62
Siblings honda civic
Weight: 0.66
, bmw
Weight: 0.64
, theory
Weight: 0.63
, platform
Weight: 0.62
, hybrid
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in current atomic theory 1.00
be related to theories 0.77
be related to hypothesis 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(model, be in current atomic theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(model, be in current atomic theory)

Similarity expansion

0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(model, be in current atomic theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(model, be related to hypothesis)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(model, be in current atomic theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(model, be related to theories)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(model, be in current atomic theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(model, be related to hypothesis)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(model, be in current atomic theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(model, be related to theories)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(model, be in current atomic theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(model, be related to theories)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(model, be in current atomic theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(model, be related to hypothesis)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(model, be in current atomic theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(model, be related to hypothesis)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(model, be in current atomic theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(model, be related to theories)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(model, be in current atomic theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(model, be in current atomic theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(model, be in current atomic theory)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(model, be in current atomic theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(model, be in current atomic theory)