model: be related to hypothesis

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents example
Weight: 0.65
, solution
Weight: 0.64
, approach
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.62
Siblings honda civic
Weight: 0.66
, bmw
Weight: 0.64
, theory
Weight: 0.63
, platform
Weight: 0.62
, hybrid
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to hypothesis 1.00
be related to hypotheses 0.90
be related to theories 0.86
be in current atomic theory 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(model, be related to hypothesis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(model, be related to hypothesis)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(model, be related to hypothesis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(model, be related to hypotheses)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(model, be related to hypothesis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(model, be related to hypotheses)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(model, be related to hypothesis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(model, be related to theories)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(model, be related to hypothesis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(model, be in current atomic theory)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(model, be related to hypothesis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(model, be in current atomic theory)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(model, be related to hypothesis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(model, be related to theories)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(model, be related to hypothesis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(model, be in current atomic theory)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(model, be related to hypothesis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(model, be related to hypotheses)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(model, be related to hypothesis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(model, be in current atomic theory)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(model, be related to hypothesis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(model, be related to theories)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(model, be related to hypothesis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(model, be related to hypotheses)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(model, be related to hypothesis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(model, be related to theories)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(model, be related to hypothesis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(model, be related to hypothesis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(model, be related to hypothesis)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(model, be related to hypothesis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(model, be related to hypothesis)