modem: is processing device

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.70
, network device
Weight: 0.70
, electronic device
Weight: 0.66
, equipment
Weight: 0.63
, peripheral
Weight: 0.61
Siblings router
Weight: 0.38
, computer network
Weight: 0.38
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.37
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.36
, antenna
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is processing device 1.00
have processors 0.78
detect devices 0.78
need device drivers 0.76
be used in data communication system 0.76
be necessary component of data communication system 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(device, need device drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(modem, is processing device)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(modem, is processing device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(device, need device drivers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(modem, is processing device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(device, need device drivers)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(modem, is processing device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(router, have processors)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(modem, is processing device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(router, detect devices)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(device, need device drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(modem, is processing device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(modem, is processing device)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(modem, is processing device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(router, have processors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(router, have processors)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(modem, is processing device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(router, detect devices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(router, detect devices)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(modem, is processing device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(modem, is processing device)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(modem, is processing device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(modem, be necessary component of data communication system)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(modem, is processing device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(modem, be used in data communication system)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(modem, is processing device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(modem, be used in data communication system)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(modem, is processing device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(modem, be used in data communication system)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(modem, is processing device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(modem, be used in data communication system)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(modem, is processing device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(modem, be necessary component of data communication system)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(modem, is processing device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(modem, be necessary component of data communication system)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(modem, is processing device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(modem, be necessary component of data communication system)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(modem, is processing device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(modem, is processing device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(modem, is processing device)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(modem, is processing device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(modem, is processing device)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(modem, is processing device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(device, need device drivers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(modem, is processing device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(router, have processors)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(modem, is processing device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(router, detect devices)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(modem, is processing device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(device, need device drivers)