router: have processors

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents network device
Weight: 0.69
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.66
, electronic device
Weight: 0.65
, hardware
Weight: 0.63
, software
Weight: 0.62
Siblings modem
Weight: 0.38
, computer network
Weight: 0.38
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.37
, server
Weight: 0.37
, motherboard
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have processors 1.00
have 2 processors 0.98
use xeon processors 0.95
is processing device 0.78
need cores 0.78
interact with chipsets 0.78
need many cores 0.77
interact with connected chipsets 0.76
be called motherboards 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(router, have processors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(server, have 2 processors)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(router, have processors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(server, use xeon processors)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(router, have processors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(modem, is processing device)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(router, have processors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(motherboard, be called motherboards)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(router, have processors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(server, have 2 processors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(server, have 2 processors)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(router, have processors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(server, use xeon processors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(server, use xeon processors)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(router, have processors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(modem, is processing device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(modem, is processing device)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(router, have processors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(motherboard, be called motherboards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(motherboard, be called motherboards)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(router, have processors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(router, have processors)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(router, have processors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(router, have processors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(router, have processors)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(router, have processors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(router, have processors)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(router, have processors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(modem, is processing device)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(router, have processors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(motherboard, be called motherboards)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(router, have processors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(server, use xeon processors)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(router, have processors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(server, have 2 processors)