monitor: be measured in inches

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.63
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.62
, screen
Weight: 0.60
, interface
Weight: 0.59
Siblings computer monitor
Weight: 0.39
, electronic device
Weight: 0.34
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.34
, network device
Weight: 0.33
, cooling device
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be measured in inches 1.00
be measured in inch 0.92
be measured 0.82
is measured 0.81
is measured diagonally 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(screen, be measured in inches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(monitor, be measured in inches)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(screen, is measured diagonally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(monitor, be measured in inches)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(monitor, be measured in inches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(screen, be measured in inches)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(monitor, be measured in inches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(screen, is measured diagonally)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be measured in inches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(screen, be measured in inches)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be measured in inches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(screen, is measured diagonally)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be measured in inches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, is measured diagonally)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be measured in inches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, is measured)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(screen, be measured in inches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(monitor, be measured in inches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(monitor, be measured in inches)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(screen, is measured diagonally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(monitor, be measured in inches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(monitor, be measured in inches)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(monitor, be measured in inches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer monitor, is measured) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, is measured)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(monitor, be measured in inches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(computer monitor, is measured diagonally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, is measured diagonally)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(monitor, be measured in inches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(monitor, be measured in inches)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(monitor, be measured in inches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(monitor, be measured in inch)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(monitor, be measured in inches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(monitor, be measured in inch)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(monitor, be measured in inches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(monitor, be measured in inch)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(monitor, be measured in inches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(monitor, is measured diagonally)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(monitor, be measured in inches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be measured in inch)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(monitor, be measured in inches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(monitor, is measured diagonally)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(monitor, be measured in inches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(monitor, is measured diagonally)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(monitor, be measured in inches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(monitor, is measured diagonally)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(monitor, be measured in inches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(monitor, be measured in inches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be measured in inches)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(monitor, be measured in inches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(monitor, be measured in inches)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be measured in inches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(screen, be measured in inches)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be measured in inches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(screen, is measured diagonally)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be measured in inches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer monitor, is measured)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be measured in inches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(computer monitor, is measured diagonally)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(monitor, be measured in inches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(screen, be measured in inches)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(monitor, be measured in inches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(screen, is measured diagonally)