screen: is measured diagonally

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents display
Weight: 0.62
, graphic
Weight: 0.62
, feature
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.60
Siblings table
Weight: 0.62
, monitor
Weight: 0.60
, retina
Weight: 0.54
, touchpad
Weight: 0.52
, blowjob
Weight: 0.49

Related properties

Property Similarity
is measured diagonally 1.00
be measured in inches 0.80
is horizontal 0.79
is curved 0.78
is measured 0.77
be measured 0.76
is angled 0.76
is rectangular 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(screen, is measured diagonally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be measured in inches)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(screen, is measured diagonally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(monitor, is rectangular)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(screen, is measured diagonally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(monitor, is measured diagonally)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(screen, is measured diagonally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(table, is angled)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(screen, is measured diagonally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(monitor, is curved)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(screen, is measured diagonally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(monitor, is measured diagonally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(monitor, is measured diagonally)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(screen, is measured diagonally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(monitor, is curved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(monitor, is curved)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(screen, is measured diagonally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(table, is angled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(table, is angled)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(screen, is measured diagonally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(monitor, be measured in inches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(monitor, be measured in inches)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(screen, is measured diagonally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(monitor, is rectangular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(monitor, is rectangular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(screen, is measured diagonally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(screen, is measured diagonally)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(screen, is measured diagonally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(screen, be measured in inches)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(screen, is measured diagonally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(screen, be measured in inches)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(screen, is measured diagonally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(screen, be measured in inches)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(screen, is measured diagonally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(screen, be measured in inches)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(screen, is measured diagonally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(screen, is measured diagonally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(screen, is measured diagonally)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(screen, is measured diagonally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(screen, is measured diagonally)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(screen, is measured diagonally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(table, is angled)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(screen, is measured diagonally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(monitor, is curved)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(screen, is measured diagonally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(monitor, is measured diagonally)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(screen, is measured diagonally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(monitor, be measured in inches)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(screen, is measured diagonally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(monitor, is rectangular)