monitor: is curved

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.63
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.62
, screen
Weight: 0.60
, interface
Weight: 0.59
Siblings computer monitor
Weight: 0.39
, electronic device
Weight: 0.34
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.34
, network device
Weight: 0.33
, cooling device
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is curved 1.00
is rectangular 0.83
be rectangular sets 0.79
is measured diagonally 0.78
is horizontal 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(screen, is measured diagonally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(monitor, is curved)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(monitor, is curved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(screen, is measured diagonally)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(monitor, is curved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(screen, is measured diagonally)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(monitor, is curved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be rectangular sets)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(monitor, is curved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, is measured diagonally)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(screen, is measured diagonally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(monitor, is curved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(monitor, is curved)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(monitor, is curved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(computer monitor, is measured diagonally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, is measured diagonally)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(monitor, is curved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(computer monitor, be rectangular sets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be rectangular sets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(monitor, is curved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(monitor, is curved)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(monitor, is curved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(monitor, is rectangular)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(monitor, is curved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(monitor, is measured diagonally)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(monitor, is curved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(monitor, is rectangular)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(monitor, is curved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(monitor, is measured diagonally)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(monitor, is curved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(monitor, is rectangular)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(monitor, is curved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(monitor, is measured diagonally)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(monitor, is curved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(monitor, is rectangular)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(monitor, is curved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(monitor, is measured diagonally)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(monitor, is curved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(monitor, is curved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(monitor, is curved)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(monitor, is curved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(monitor, is curved)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(monitor, is curved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(screen, is measured diagonally)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(monitor, is curved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be rectangular sets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(monitor, is curved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(computer monitor, is measured diagonally)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(monitor, is curved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(screen, is measured diagonally)