monitor: look on camera

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.63
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.62
, screen
Weight: 0.60
, interface
Weight: 0.59
Siblings computer monitor
Weight: 0.39
, electronic device
Weight: 0.34
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.34
, network device
Weight: 0.33
, cooling device
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
look on camera 1.00
roll on camera 0.90
roll on when camera 0.89
flash on cameras 0.88
filmed by camera 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(screen, look on camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(monitor, look on camera)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(screen, filmed by camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(monitor, look on camera)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(monitor, look on camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(screen, look on camera)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(monitor, look on camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(screen, filmed by camera)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(monitor, look on camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(screen, filmed by camera)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(monitor, look on camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(screen, look on camera)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(monitor, look on camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, roll on camera)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(monitor, look on camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, roll on when camera)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(screen, look on camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(monitor, look on camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(monitor, look on camera)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(screen, filmed by camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(monitor, look on camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(monitor, look on camera)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(monitor, look on camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(computer monitor, roll on camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, roll on camera)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(monitor, look on camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(computer monitor, roll on when camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, roll on when camera)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(monitor, look on camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(monitor, look on camera)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(monitor, look on camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(monitor, look on camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(monitor, look on camera)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(monitor, look on camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(monitor, look on camera)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(monitor, look on camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(screen, look on camera)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(monitor, look on camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(screen, filmed by camera)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(monitor, look on camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(computer monitor, roll on when camera)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(monitor, look on camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(computer monitor, roll on camera)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(monitor, look on camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(screen, look on camera)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(monitor, look on camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(screen, filmed by camera)