screen: look on camera

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents display
Weight: 0.62
, graphic
Weight: 0.62
, feature
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.60
Siblings table
Weight: 0.62
, monitor
Weight: 0.60
, retina
Weight: 0.54
, touchpad
Weight: 0.52
, blowjob
Weight: 0.49

Related properties

Property Similarity
look on camera 1.00
flash on cameras 0.88
filmed by camera 0.86
is zoom 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(screen, look on camera)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(touchpad, is zoom)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(screen, look on camera)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(monitor, look on camera)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(screen, look on camera)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(monitor, look on camera)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(monitor, look on camera)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(screen, look on camera)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(touchpad, is zoom)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(touchpad, is zoom)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(screen, look on camera)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(screen, look on camera)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(screen, look on camera)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(screen, filmed by camera)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(screen, look on camera)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(screen, filmed by camera)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(screen, look on camera)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(screen, filmed by camera)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(screen, look on camera)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(screen, filmed by camera)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(screen, look on camera)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(screen, look on camera)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(screen, look on camera)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(screen, look on camera)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(screen, look on camera)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(screen, look on camera)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(monitor, look on camera)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(screen, look on camera)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(touchpad, is zoom)