monitor: network

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.63
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.62
, screen
Weight: 0.60
, interface
Weight: 0.59
Siblings computer monitor
Weight: 0.39
, electronic device
Weight: 0.34
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.34
, network device
Weight: 0.33
, cooling device
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
network 1.00
be located in network 0.86
be recognized on computer networks 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(device, be located in network)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(monitor, network)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(device, be recognized on computer networks)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(monitor, network)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(monitor, network)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(device, be located in network)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(monitor, network)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(device, be recognized on computer networks)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(monitor, network)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, be located in network)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(monitor, network)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(device, be recognized on computer networks)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(device, be located in network)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(monitor, network)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(monitor, network)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(device, be recognized on computer networks)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(monitor, network)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(monitor, network)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(monitor, network)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(monitor, network)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(monitor, network)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(monitor, network)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(monitor, network)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(monitor, network)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(monitor, network)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(monitor, network)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(device, be located in network)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(monitor, network)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(device, be recognized on computer networks)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(monitor, network)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(device, be located in network)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(monitor, network)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(device, be recognized on computer networks)